Evan Peters (left) and Donald Glover star in “The Lazarus Effect” (Photo Credit: Back to Life Productions, LLC/Daniel McFadden).
Horrific Horror Hour and a Half
One word can describe the horror film “The Lazarus Effect” – horrendous.
From the very beginning of the movie, the unrealistic scenes leave some viewers wondering, “why go there?”
“The Lazarus Effect” has a known, accomplished cast that seems to have been given an amateur script.
Frank (Mark Duplass) and Zoe (Olivia Wilde) is an engaged couple who are both researchers.
Along with their other team members, they have created a “potion” that proves they can bring the dead back to life.
To prove their theory, they use animals to show how effective their experiment is.
Besides having to make a few changes, they are pleased with their results.
Their “underground” experiments are unethical, and unbeknownst to them being watched.
The dean of the university they work at basically gives them a slap on the wrist, warns them, and ends up shutting their whole operation down.
In a frantic frenzy, the team, which includes Donald Glover (Niko), Evan Peters (Clay), and a young camera girl, Eva (Sarah Bolger), race against time to recreate their invention.
In the midst of recreating the impossible, something goes terribly wrong.
One of the researchers on the team is affected by the malfunction and the team has to make decisions that would change all of their lives forever.
“The Lazarus Effect” is full of classic horror film clichés.
One doesn’t have to wonder what will happen next because it is quite obvious.
“The Lazarus Effect” doesn’t leave the viewer sitting on the edge of their seat anxiously waiting to see what happens next, but instead wondering how much longer it will last. “The Lazarus Effect” would be the horror film of choice for a viewer who is a newbie to this genre of films.
It would ease them into it without terrifying them and with minimum surprises.
However, for the veteran horror film lover, this one may not fit the bill.
REGAL RATINGS
FOUR CROWNS=EXCELLENT
THREE CROWNS=GOOD
TWO CROWNS=AVERAGE
ONE CROWN=POOR
Magazine Topics:
- Movie Review: ‘Insidious: Chapter 3’ Doesn’t Produce Chills Like Predecessors
- Movie Review: ‘The Gallows’ Gets Death Sentence
- Movie Review: Halle Berry Puts New Twist on ‘Kidnap’ Tale
- Movie Review: ‘Missing’ Craaaazy Movie Version of an ID Show
- Marlon Wayans Tops Original in ‘A Haunted House 2’
- Film Review: Although Just a Doll, ‘Annabelle’ Gives Chills
- Movie Review: ‘Dracula Untold’ Better Left Untold
- Film
- ‘Locke’ Shows Problem With Realistic Films
- Movie Review: ‘The Purge: Anarchy’ Makes One Think
- Movie Review: ‘The Equalizer’ Equals Other Denzel Washington Classics
- Film Review: ‘Poltergeist’ Scary, But Not Terrifying
- Movie Review: ‘Nope’ a Yep Because of Sheer Fear, Relatable Characters
- Movie Review: ‘Halloween Ends’ Gory, Better Than ‘Halloween Kills’
- Movie Review: M. Night Shyamalan’s ‘Knock at the Cabin’ Definitely Different
- Movie Review: ‘The Boogeyman’ Chill-Inducing, Spine Tingling
- Movie Review: ‘The Blackening’ Definitely Won’t Win Oscar, But Will Contend for Hood Oscar
- Movie Review: ‘Haunted Mansion’ Halfway Decent Thanks to Haddish, Stanfield and Ghost Realm
- Movie Review: ‘A Haunting in Venice’ Classic Whodunit But Wrong Release Date
- Movie Review: ‘The Exorcist: Believer’ Dramatic, Demonic
- Movie Review: ‘Thanksgiving’ Might Have its Own Film Franchise
- Movie Review: ‘The First Omen’ Evil Personified, Predictable
- Movie Review: ‘The Watchers’ a Little Too Eccentric
- Movie Review: ‘A Quiet Place: Day One’ an Origin Story That Holds its Own
- Movie Review: ‘Alien: Romulus’ Epitomizes Dangers of Technology, Alien Life