(Photo Credit: Universal Pictures)
Far-Fetched but Exciting
The good thing about cinema is that it is an escape from reality.
Often, movies are unrealistic and far-fetched but because moviegoers seek an escape from reality, reality is not really necessary to create a good film.
“Non-Stop” falls into the category of movies that are exciting and thrilling, but unrealistic.
Liam Neeson stars as Bill Marks, a federal air marshal struggling with alcoholism and the death of his beloved daughter Olivia.
Marks boards the transatlantic flight to London with fellow agent Jack Hammond (Anson Mount).
What begins as a typical flight turns into an act of terrorism after Marks begins receiving anonymous text messages demanding $150 million be deposited into an offshore bank account that has been set up in Marks’ name.
The anonymous terrorist threatens to kill a passenger every 20 minutes if the money is not transferred.
Every one is a potential threat, from other marshals and airline employees who can walk by security clearance or someone who is not even on the plane.
The people that he believes are trustworthy like passenger Jen (Julianne Moore) and flight attendant Nancy (Michelle Dockery) cannot be completely trusted until the plane is safely on the ground and a catastrophe is avoided.
What makes matters worse is that whoever the culprit is has framed Marks, making it appear that he is the terrorist making the demands.
Marks’ colleagues on the ground will not listen to his pleas, nor will pilots.
Nevertheless, his job is to save as many lives as possible despite the reality that all will not make it off of the plane alive.
Credit has to be given to the writers of “Non-Stop,” John W. Richardson and Christopher Roach, along with director Jaume Collet-Sera, for being creative enough to make the story stretch into a 106 minute feature length film.
Some characters in “Non-Stop” stand out as potential threats, but others will totally catch moviegoers by surprise.
What could have been a storyline that only resulted in a good short film, definitely will keep moviegoers guessing and anticipating the outcome.
The acting is superb by Neeson and Moore. And while Nate Parker, who plays Zack, has a smaller part than normal, the film marks a departure for him from roles his fans are accustomed to seeing him in.
However, “Non-Stop” will leave moviegoers either believing that the plot is implausible or hoping that it is implausible.
Filmmakers get an “A” for effort and creativity, but believing that a person can cause or predict a death on a plane every 20 minutes without being recognized is highly unlikely.
Furthermore, one will find it impossible to believe that a person can open up an offshore bank account in someone else’s name or that a real terrorist would be stupid enough to demand money and then force the victims to wire it to their own personal account.
Nonetheless, people do not always watch movies to catch a glimpse of real life, but to escape from the pressure of real life.
While “Non-Stop” might not alleviate the pressure of real life, it will take moviegoers on a thrilling and suspenseful ride and make one question the next move for international terrorists.
“Non-Stop” will also make one question how safe airline passengers really are even after beefed up security in the aftermath of Sept. 11.
REGAL RATINGS
FOUR CROWNS=EXCELLENT
THREE CROWNS=GOOD
TWO CROWNS=AVERAGE
ONE CROWN=POOR
Magazine Topics:
- Film Review: ‘Devotion’ Heartbreaking, Much-Needed Portrayal of Korean War
- Film Review: ‘The Creator’ on Some New Age ‘Ish’
- From O-Dog to Darius Lovehall to Frankie Lymon: The Top 10 Larenz Tate Films of All Time
- Movie Review: ‘Monkey Man’ Glorious Bloodbath
- Movie Review: ‘Bright’ Tries Not To Give Way To Darkness
- Film Review: ‘Guy Ritchie’s The Covenant’ Heroic in More Ways Than One
- Movie Review: ‘The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes’ Might Be Best One
- Contraband Movie Review
- Safe Film a Safe Bet for Movie Execs
- End of Watch Film a Must-Watch
- Movie Review: ‘Sabotage’ Represents Rebirth for Action Star
- Movie Review: ‘Shotgun Wedding’ More Slapstick Unlike Intelligent ‘You People’
- Film Review: Pick Great Adjective, That is ‘John Wick: Chapter 4’
- Movie Review: ‘Fast X’ Regains Speed for Awesome Franchise While Injecting New Energy
- Movie Review: ‘Transformers: Rise of the Beasts’ Delivers the ‘Dopeness’ from Top to Bottom
- Film Review: ‘Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny’ Pure Adrenaline Rush With Some History Thrown In
- Movie Review: ‘Mission Impossible—Dead Reckoning Part One’ Darn Near Flawless
- Movie Review: ‘The Killer’ Not That Killer
- Movie Review: In Book of ‘The Beekeeper,’ Vengeance is Mine Says Adam Clay
- Film Review: ‘Dune: Part Two’ Better Than First and First Was Classic
- Movie Review: ‘Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire’ Cool, But Drags
- Movie Review: Stunt Doubles Get Some Shine in Crazy, Insanely Unique ‘The Fall Guy’
- Movie Review: ‘Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes’ Boasts Good Storyline That Parallels Chattel Slavery
- Movie Review: ‘Twisters’ Dazzles, But Might Cause PTSD for Houston Moviegoers
- Movie Review: ‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ Comical With Epic Cameos