(Photo Credit: Warner Bros. Pictures)
Massive Success
½
Everything about the monster Godzilla is massive.
Massive fights versus malevolent enemies; massive victories; massive destruction have all been a part of the “Godzilla” franchise, despite the fact that not all of the “Godzilla” installments have left fans massively satisfied.
However, 2014 represents a new beginning for the massive creature, and the latest film does nothing but satisfy and then some.
In 1999, seismic activity in Japan leads to the death and destruction of many people and things in a Japanese town.
Joe Brody (Bryan Cranston) is supposed to be celebrating his birthday with his wife and son Ford, but instead is forced into a life and death situation that he has to manage.
Many of the residents of the Japanese town work at a local radiation plant and the common assumption is that either excess radiation led to the tremors or it was a natural disaster and totally unavoidable.
Joe always questioned the legitimacy of that assumption because the tremors had a detectable pattern and earthquakes occur randomly with no rhyme or reason.
Fifteen years after the “quake,” the entire community has been quarantined.
Joe’s son Ford (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) is now married with a four year old son, living in San Francisco and working as a military bomb expert.
When Ford is finally able to spend time with his family, away from his military duties, the United States Consulate informs him of his father’s arrest in Japan for trespassing in the quarantined district.
Upon arrival in Japan, Joe is able to persuade Ford to visit their old neighborhood where he discovers that despite the tremors there is no traceable radiation in the area. His discovery proves that there is something foreign about the tremors and that what endangers the entire planet is underground.
First and foremost, “Godzilla” filmmakers like director Gareth Edwards and writers Max Borenstein and Dave Callaham should take a bow because many blockbusters have great acting or great special effects.
Rarely does a summer blockbuster benefit from both qualities. But the filmmakers are able to combine modern technology with old-fashioned good acting to make a brilliant picture.
Taylor-Johnson will be Hollywood’s next big action star. The 23-year-old English actor has the physicality required for an action movie star, but also has the sensitivity and emotion of a veteran thespian. Like many action films, you either get one gift or the other, but like “Godzilla” the lead actor has both necessities.
The special effects are magnificent. The creatures that modern technology creates continue to amaze with the colossal size of the monsters and their dexterity.
Furthermore, Cranston shines just as brightly as Taylor-Johnson. He is able to emotionally convey the pain of a hurt husband and father.
Also, the actor is able to portray a convincing science geek without becoming too nerdy with too much science jargon. He is a sympathetic and likeable nerd in a sense.
Nevertheless, “Godzilla” did not necessarily need 3-D technology to be an effective film.
Granted, the fighting scenes between the monsters and the destruction of skyscrapers makes 3-D understandable, but 95 percent of the film could have been in regular 2-D and audiences would have not felt slighted.
Nonetheless, the film’s massive positive traits more than compensates for its miniscule negative trait.
The result for “Godzilla” is a gigantic hit film on a massive scale.
REGAL RATINGS
FOUR CROWNS=EXCELLENT
THREE CROWNS=GOOD
TWO CROWNS=AVERAGE
ONE CROWN=POOR
Magazine Topics:
- Film Review: ‘Devotion’ Heartbreaking, Much-Needed Portrayal of Korean War
- Film Review: ‘The Creator’ on Some New Age ‘Ish’
- From O-Dog to Darius Lovehall to Frankie Lymon: The Top 10 Larenz Tate Films of All Time
- Movie Review: ‘Monkey Man’ Glorious Bloodbath
- Movie Review: ‘Bright’ Tries Not To Give Way To Darkness
- Film Review: ‘Guy Ritchie’s The Covenant’ Heroic in More Ways Than One
- Movie Review: ‘The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes’ Might Be Best One
- Contraband Movie Review
- Safe Film a Safe Bet for Movie Execs
- End of Watch Film a Must-Watch
- Movie Review: ‘Non-Stop’ Lives up to Name but Hard to Believe
- Movie Review: ‘Shotgun Wedding’ More Slapstick Unlike Intelligent ‘You People’
- Film Review: Pick Great Adjective, That is ‘John Wick: Chapter 4’
- Movie Review: ‘Fast X’ Regains Speed for Awesome Franchise While Injecting New Energy
- Movie Review: ‘Transformers: Rise of the Beasts’ Delivers the ‘Dopeness’ from Top to Bottom
- Film Review: ‘Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny’ Pure Adrenaline Rush With Some History Thrown In
- Movie Review: ‘Mission Impossible—Dead Reckoning Part One’ Darn Near Flawless
- Movie Review: ‘The Killer’ Not That Killer
- Movie Review: In Book of ‘The Beekeeper,’ Vengeance is Mine Says Adam Clay
- Film Review: ‘Dune: Part Two’ Better Than First and First Was Classic
- Movie Review: ‘Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire’ Cool, But Drags
- Movie Review: Stunt Doubles Get Some Shine in Crazy, Insanely Unique ‘The Fall Guy’
- Movie Review: ‘Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes’ Boasts Good Storyline That Parallels Chattel Slavery
- Movie Review: ‘Twisters’ Dazzles, But Might Cause PTSD for Houston Moviegoers
- Movie Review: ‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ Comical With Epic Cameos